Latest Twist in Gyanvapi Mosque Case: Hindu Plaintiffs Seek ASI Survey for 'Shivling'

 The Gyanvapi mosque case in Varanasi, India, has witnessed a new twist as Hindu plaintiffs recently approached the Supreme Court, urging for a comprehensive Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) investigation. The four Hindu women who initially filed the suit are now seeking the court's direction to the ASI to examine a structure inside the sealed area of the mosque, which is claimed to be a 'Shivling.' Their petition outlines several key points:

Firstly, the plaintiffs argue that a thorough investigation utilizing excavation and scientific methods is essential to determine the original nature of the 'Shivling' and any associated features. They assert that such an examination is crucial for establishing the truth about the object and resolving the dispute over whether it is a fountain, as claimed by Muslims, or a religious object for Hindus.

Secondly, the application seeks to overturn a prior order that had deferred the carbon dating of the 'Shivling' and a comprehensive survey of the sealed area. The plaintiffs believe that removing "artificial/modern walls" surrounding the 'Shivling' is vital for a proper assessment of its historical and religious significance.

The Hindu side views the ASI as the appropriate authority to conduct a scientific and unbiased investigation. They believe that the survey is necessary not only for understanding the 'Shivling' but also for determining the truth about the entire disputed area.

In earlier developments, advocate commissioners discovered a "big Shivling" under a pond during a court-ordered survey in May 2022. Subsequently, the Supreme Court instructed the Varanasi District Magistrate to safeguard the area. In May 2023, the Allahabad High Court directed the ASI to conduct a scientific survey, including carbon dating. However, the Supreme Court deferred the survey of the sealed area in May 2023 following objections from the Muslim side.

Looking forward, the Supreme Court is set to evaluate the Hindu side's request for a thorough ASI survey covering both the 'Shivling' and the sealed area. This decision holds the potential to reignite tensions between Hindu and Muslim communities. Considering the delicate nature of religious sentiments and historical contentions, the Gyanvapi mosque case is poised to stay under the public spotlight.

It is crucial to highlight that this summary is drawn from publicly available information and does not assert to encompass all nuances or perspectives of the Gyanvapi mosque case. To gain a comprehensive understanding, individuals are advised to conduct their own research and consider diverse viewpoints before forming an opinion.